Puma v Court of Justice of the European Union

ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Second Chamber)15 June 2022 (*)(Action for annulment – Order of the Court of Justice not to allow an appeal to proceed – Act not open to challenge – Manifest inadmissibility)In Case T‑79/22,Puma SE, established in Herzogenaurach (Germany), represented by M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers,applicant,v Court of Justice of the European Union,defendant,THE GENERAL COURT (Second Chamber),composed of V. Tomljenović (Rapporteur), President, F. Schalin and D. Kukovec, Judges,Registrar: E. Coulon,having regard to the written part of the procedure,makes the following Order 1        By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Puma SE, seeks the annulment of the order of 1 December 2021, Puma v EUIPO (C‑462/21 P, not published, EU:C:2021:982; ‘the contested order’), adopted pursuant to Article 58 a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, by which the Court decided not to allow the appeal brought by the applicant against the judgment of 19 May 2021, Puma v EUIPO – Gemma Group (Representation of a bounding feline) (T‑510/19, not published, EU:T:2021:281) to proceed. Form of order sought by the applicant 2        By application lodged at the Court Registry on 11 February 2022, the applicant, Puma SE, brought the present action.3        The applicant claims that the General Court should annul the contested order. Law 4        Under Article 126 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, where it is clear that the Court has no...