Constantinescu v Parliament

JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Eighth Chamber)4 October 2018 (*)(Civil service — Officials — Education — Admission to childcare facilities — Decision to enrol a child in childcare facilities other than those where he was previously enrolled — Mistaken designation of the defendant in the application — Inadmissibility — Liability)In Case T‑17/17,Radu Constantinescu, residing in Kreuzweiler (Germany), represented by S. Rodrigues et A. Blot, lawyers,applicant,v European Parliament, represented by E. Taneva and L. Deneys, acting as Agents,defendant,application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Office for Infrastructure and Logistics — Luxembourg (OIL) registering the applicant’s child at the childcare facilities of the European School Luxembourg II — Bertrange-Mamer and, consequently, refusing his registration at the childcare facilities of the European School Luxembourg I — Kirchberg, and of the decision of the European Parliament of 7 October 2016 rejecting the applicant’s complaint, and, secondly, compensation for the material and non-material harm that the applicant allegedly suffered,THE GENERAL COURT (Eighth Chamber),composed of A. M. Collins, President, R. Barents (Rapporteur) and J. Passer, Judges,Registrar: M. Marescaux, Administrator,having regard to the written part of the procedure and further to the hearing on 8 March 2018,gives the following Judgment Background to the dispute 1        The applicant, Mr Radu Constantinescu,...