Variuscard v EUIPO (CRYPTOSTAMP)

Action brought on 27 February 2025 – Variuscard v EUIPO (CRYPTOSTAMP)(Case T-140/25)Language of the case: German Parties Applicant: Variuscard Produktions- und Handels Gmb H (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: A. Koller, lawyer)Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office Details of the proceedings before EUIPOTrade mark at issue: Application for registration of a European Union word mark – Application No 18 937 926 Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 December 2024 in Case R 1585/2024-2 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should:annul or, where appropriate, alter the contested decision;order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court and the costs of the appeal proceedings. Pleas in law Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.____________