Casamance

Appeal brought on 15 January 2025 by Apc Europe SL, Apc Polska sp. z o.o., Veos NV, Veos Ibérica SL, Vapran SAS, Sonac Loenen BV, Sonac Uśnice sp. z o.o., Sonac Bad Bramstedt Gmb H, Haripro Sp A, EAPA against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 5 November 2024 in Case T-1194/23, Apc Europe and Others v Commission(Case C-20/25 P)Language of the case: Italian Parties Appellants: Apc Europe SL, Apc Polska sp. z o.o., Veos NV, Veos Ibérica SL, Vapran SAS, Sonac Loenen BV, Sonac Uśnice sp. z o.o., Sonac Bad Bramstedt Gmb H, Haripro Sp A, EAPA (represented by: M. Moretto, avvocato)Other party to the proceedings: European Commission Form of order sought The appellants claim that the Court should:set aside the order of the General Court of 5 November 2024 in Case T-1194/23 APC Europe and Others v Commission;refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union to rule on the appellants’ actions for annulment of the decision at issue;order the Commission to pay the costs. Grounds of appeal and main arguments In support of the appeal, the appellants rely on two grounds of appeal.1. First ground of appeal: infringement and misinterpretation of Article 263 TFEU; failure to rule on the admissibility of part of the action; distortion of the content of the decision at issue and of the arguments put forward by the appellants; infringement of the obligation to state reasons; infringement and misinterpretation of the second sentence of Article 7(2) of...