Case T-227/20: Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Biovene Cosmetics v EUIPO — Eugène Perma France (BIOVÈNE BARCELONA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU f...

C 329/22 EN Official Journal of the European Union 16.8.2021 Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Zoom v EUIPO — Facetec (ZOOM) (Case T-204/20) (1) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark ZOOM — Earlier EU figurative and word marks ZOOM — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8 (1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) (2021/C 329/27) Language of the case: English Parties Applicant: Zoom KK (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: M. de Arpe Tejero, lawyer) Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Zajfert, J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents) Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Facetec, Inc. (Las Vegas, Nevada, United States) (represented by: P. Wilhelm, lawyer) Re: Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 February 2020 (Case R 507/2019 1) relating to opposition proceedings between Zoom KK and Facetec. Operative part of the judgment The Court: 1. Dismisses the action; 2. Orders Zoom KK to pay the costs. (1) OJ C 201, 15.6.2020. Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — Biovene Cosmetics v EUIPO — Eugène Perma France (BIOVÈNE BARCELONA) (Case T-227/20) (1) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark...