Dekoback v EUIPO

ORDER OF THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COURT 9 July 2020 (*)(Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170 a(2) and (3) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Formal requirements relating to the request that the appeal be allowed to proceed — Failure to put in order — Inadmissibility)In Case C‑193/20 P,APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 6 May 2020,Dekoback Gmb H, established in Helmstadt-Bargen (Germany), represented by V. von Moers, Rechtsanwalt,applicant,the other party to the proceedings being:European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), defendant at first instance,THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COURT,having regard to the proposal from K. Jürimäe, Judge-Rapporteur, after hearing the Advocate General, M. Szpunar,makes the following Order 1        By its appeal, Dekoback Gmb H asks the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 5 March 2020, Dekoback v EUIPO — Deco Pac (DECOPAC) (T‑80/19, not published, EU:T:2020:81), by which the General Court dismissed its action for annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 November 2018 (Case R 1795/2017-5), concerning revocation proceedings between Dekoback and Deco Pac Inc.2        Under the first paragraph of Article 58 a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union,...