Aerospinning Master Franchising v EUIPO - Mad Dogg Athletics (SPINNING)

Action brought on 27 April 2020 — Aerospinning Master Franchising v EUIPO — Mad Dogg Athletics (SPINNING)(Case T-246/20)Language in which the application was lodged: Czech Parties Applicant: Aerospinning Master Franchising s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: K. Labalestra, lawyer)Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. (Venice, California, United States)Details of the proceedings before EUIPOProprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘SPINNING’ — European Union trade mark No 175 117 Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2020 in Case R 369/2019-4 Form of order sought The applicant claims that the Court should:annul the contested decision;order EUIPO to pay the costs. Pleas in law Infringement of Article 58(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;Infringement of Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;Infringement of Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.____________