Tertianum Services v EUIPO

ORDER OF THE COURT (Tenth Chamber)5 June 2025 (*)( Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Manifest inadmissibility – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a person who was not a party to the proceedings before the General Court – EU trade mark – Articles 174 to 176 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Replacement of a party – Transfer of an intellectual property right during the proceedings before the General Court – No application for replacement )In Case C‑800/24 P,APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 13 November 2024,Tertianum Services AG, established in Baar (Switzerland), represented by S. Fröhlich, M. Hartmann and H. Lerchl, Rechtsanwälte,appellant,the other parties to the proceedings being:Tertianum AG, established in Dübendorf (Switzerland), represented by S. Fröhlich and M. Hartmann, Rechtsanwälte,applicant at first instance,European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), represented by D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, acting as Agent,defendant at first instance,DPF AG, established in Berlin (Germany), represented by A. Nordemann, Rechtsanwalt,intervener at first instance,THE COURT (Tenth Chamber),composed of D. Gratsias, President of the Chamber, J. Passer (Rapporteur) and B. Smulders, Judges,Advocate General: L. Medina,Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to give a...