Semedo v Parliament

Provisional text JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition)12 March 2025 (*)( Law governing the institutions – Member of Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing on a Member the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for 10 days – Right to be heard – Rights of the defence )In Case T‑349/23,Monica Semedo, residing in Grevenmacher (Luxembourg), represented by T. Bontinck, A. Guillerme and L. Marchal, lawyers,applicant,v European Parliament, represented by D. Boytha, N. Görlitz and A. Krachler, acting as Agents,defendant,THE GENERAL COURT (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition),composed of S. Papasavvas, President, R. da Silva Passos, N. Półtorak, I. Reine and T. Pynnä (Rapporteur), Judges,Registrar: H. Eriksson, Administrator,having regard to the written part of the procedure,having regard to the request for production of documents sent by the Court to the Parliament on 11 July 2024 and the Parliament’s response lodged at the Court Registry on 17 July 2024,further to the hearing on 8 October 2024,gives the following Judgment 1        By her action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant, Ms Monica Semedo, seeks annulment of the decisions of the European Parliament of 17 April 2023 by which the Parliament, in the first place, found that certain acts which she was alleged to have engaged...