Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO

ORDER OF THE COURT (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed)21 March 2023 (*)(Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170 b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)In Case C‑788/22 P,APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 28 December 2022,Louis Vuitton Malletier SAS, established in Paris (France), represented by P. Roncaglia and N. Parrotta, avvocati, and P.-Y. Gautier, avocat,appellant,the other party to the proceedings being:European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO),defendant at first instance,THE COURT (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed)composed of L. Bay Larsen, Vice-President of the Court, M. L. Arastey Sahún and J. Passer (Judge-Rapporteur), Judges,Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,having regard to the proposal from the Judge-Rapporteur and after hearing the Advocate General, N. Emiliou,makes the following Order 1        By its appeal, Louis Vuitton Malletier SAS asks the Court of Justice to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 19 October 2022, Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO – Wisniewski (Representation of a chequerboard pattern II) (T‑275/21, not published, EU:T:2022:654; ‘the judgment under appeal’), by which the...